It can be argued, for example, that certain conditions do not collect interest until after the repayment period has expired, so that the loan remains interest-free. It must therefore be determined to what extent the clause applies to make the applicant liable for the interests. The previous case did not highlight the impact of the applicant`s evidence on the terms of the written agreements to which it appeared to contradict. During the appeal process, Turner J. did not accept that the judge could have concluded that the rental vehicle was available „free“. Instead, he assumed that the applicant`s liability for the payment of the rental costs depended on whether it would claim damages on its claim against the defendant. In other words, if the complainant did not recover the costs, she would have no personal responsibility to pay them. This was set out as a common principle in L`Estrange/F Graucob Ltd  2 KB 394. The imposition of a signature on a contract that the manufacturer has neither read nor understood nevertheless creates a binding contract. This principle also applies to credit rental rights. In the appeal to Mr. Justice Turner before the High Court, the question of whether the rental costs could be recovered was examined. The court found that liability for the rental costs depended on the plaintiff successfully recovering damages for the same thing, and the result was that the applicant would not have to pay personally if no compensation was claimed.
However, Turner J.A. found that the character of the liability did not mean that the damages were not refundable. It will be interesting to see if the complainants can use this decision to successfully rebut the enforceable arguments that regularly appear in rent claims, if verbal assurances have been given that the complainants have no responsibility for the payment of taxes. Conversely, the defendants should be assured that this case does not affect their ability to execute enforceable force arguments on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentation. The credit landlord did not disclose to the applicant his right to terminate the contract and violated the termination of contracts entered into in 2008 in a consumer home or place of residence, etc. (the „2008 regulations“). „In order for these rental costs to be reimbursed by the defendant, I must be satisfied that the plaintiff is required to pay them. But its evidence, its evidence that I insist, is that it is not, and that is the only evidence I have on this… That`s why I`m convinced that this credit rent is the first obstacle… In short, I propose that, in the development of leases, there will always be pitfalls for the unwary: there are enough arguments to find enough arguments on applicability to examine very carefully the terms of the leases for which they are asked to pay.
The question, then, was: can the applicant recover the rental costs if it turns out that her own liability to the credit renter is conditional? But a lot of credit rents are decided on the trail of small claims. An interesting point that has arisen over the years is whether a credit lease itself may contain provisions similar to those of a CFA-Lite: namely an exemption from the fact that the rental costs must be paid by the customer only to the extent that they are recovered by the illicit.